Thursday, May 12, 2005

She's ready to join, as long as she can go to a fashion school, too. "I don't want to go to war,"

Guard recruiters shunned

By Tom Davis / Bergen County Record

The blood and turmoil of war are behind him. Now Sgt. 1st Class Rob Barea is fighting a new battle: He's trying to line up recruits for the New Jersey National Guard.

Occasionally, he'll get a kid who wants to travel or take advantage of the free tuition program. Others will meet Barea at a local high school and do sit-ups for him on the hallway floor to prove they're fit to fight.

Then they go home and talk to their folks.

"Some [parents] respect it," said Barea, a veteran of the 1999 Kosovo war. But others ask: "Why do you want to die?"

The National Guard clearly has become a hard sell. Because of the war in Iraq, the free tuition and other benefits are no longer attractive. Instead of a relatively safe, part-time commitment, it's viewed as a one-way ticket to the battlefield. Some critics have labeled it the "backdoor draft."

Although recruiters are working day and night, potential recruits are staying away in droves. New Jersey recruiting offices that were crowded 10 years ago are nearly deserted. Some report a 50 percent drop in business from a decade ago.

Nationwide, recruiting has dropped 22 percent since 2002, even as active-duty levels remain stable. In 2004, the Guard fell 12 percent short of its recruiting goal.

It's a huge shift since the Sept. 11 attacks, when patriotism impelled many to join. In 2002, the Guard exceeded its recruiting goals by 5 percent.

Patriotism is still high, the Pentagon says, noting that statistics can be misleading. More than 170,000 Guard members and reservists are serving in Iraq, and military officials say force levels remain strong.

Recruiters, meanwhile, say they still get a number of people interested in military service.

"You get parents who call up and say, 'Will you take my kid?' " said Sgt. Manny Vasquez, a recruiter in Passaic and Morris counties.

Many civilians say they're unwilling to take that risk, however. They note that more than 1,500 Americans have died in Iraq, 36 of them from New Jersey.

"I don't want to be in a life-or-death situation," said Kim McSharar, a senior at Lodi High School who once considered joining the military.

Potential recruits also hear the stories of people pulled from their families and full-time jobs to serve 12 to 18 months in a war zone. They fear losing their lives outside of the Guard and detaching themselves from the people they're already struggling to support.

'Something behind it'

Unlike the part-time reserves, the New Jersey Guard provides a free education at any state school. But signing up also requires a three-year commitment.

In that time, some parents say, anything can happen.

"They always think there's something behind it," said Sgt. 1st Class Gabriel Gonzalez, a recruiter in Teaneck.

Alexandra Diakos, a 16-year-old sophomore at Lodi High School, wants to join. She's athletic, although a bit unsure of her goals. The college opportunity excites her, though.

Aiming to impress the recruiters, she recently did sit-ups outside the school's cafeteria as they counted.

If Diakos joins when she's 17, she'll need her parents' signature, which is required for recruits under 18. She's not sure she'll get it.

"They're understanding," she said, "but they're afraid."

With the nation at war, fewer soldiers are leaving active duty to join the National Guard, said Lt. Col. Mike Milord, a Pentagon spokesman. What's more, some Guard members say they regret ever joining.

Before Sept. 11, they served only two weeks in the summer and one weekend a month. Now, some say, they have no plans to reenlist.

"It's ruined my life completely," said Ray Murdock, a Bass River Township resident and specialist in the Army National Guard. "It's going to take me a long, long time to recover from this."

Safe no more

The Guard was once considered a safe haven. Many young people joined during the Vietnam War - if they were lucky enough to find an opening - to avoid the conflict.

Into the 1990s, the Guard regularly reached its recruiting goals.

"Ten years ago, you could trip over people" at a recruiting station, Gonzalez said.

With no draft in place, however, the Pentagon has begun relying more heavily on the Guard for combat operations. Now, if the recruiters sign up two a week at any station, that's good.

Few have enlisted at the Teaneck and Riverdale armories, the only National Guard recruiting centers in Bergen, Passaic and Morris counties.

Recruiters often sit and wait for people to walk in, but end up looking at empty chairs.

"We have to go out there and expose ourselves to the public," said Gonzalez.

They also distribute their cellphone numbers to anyone who shows any interest and accept calls late into the night. They attend job fairs and sporting events in which potential recruits participate. They talk about family, share food and talk about rap artists.

On a rare night out with their families, recruiters will go to a mall and talk up the virtues of Guard life with a store clerk. Their spouses usually don't mind.

"Sometimes I have my wife working for me," Gonzalez said.

Going to school

For many recruiters, however, schools remain the primary target.

In Paterson, Passaic and Hackensack, recruiters pitch college and job-training opportunities. But in inner-city neighborhoods, disenfranchisement from the military, and the war, is heavy, recruiters say.

"I've gone to high schools where people have called me a murderer and a killer," Vasquez said.

At the more suburban schools, students hang out with the recruiters during their lunch periods. They pick up fliers.

Showing interest is a far cry from signing up, however.

Recently, recruiters set up a table outside the cafeteria at Lodi High School. They gave out free pencils and notebooks to students passing by. Pvt. Stephanie Saunders, a recent recruit, gave students a pep talk.

"You meet people who are willing to go to war with you, and die with you," she told a group of students.

Jacqueline Mendez, a 17-year-old senior, said she's ready to join, as long as she can go to a fashion school, too.

She did add one condition, however.

"I don't want to go to war," she said. "I can't shoot anybody. I'd be too scared."

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

Fear Control Bush Style

Ridge Reveals Clashes on Alerts Former Homeland Security Chief Debunks "Myth" By Mimi Hall, USA TODAY

The Bush administration periodically put the USA on high alert for terrorist attacks even though then-Homeland Security chief Tom Ridge argued there was only flimsy evidence to justify raising the threat level, Ridge now says.

Ridge, who resigned Feb. 1, said Tuesday that he often disagreed with administration officials who wanted to elevate the threat level to orange, or "high" risk of terrorist attack, but was overruled.

His comments at a Washington forum describe spirited debates over terrorist intelligence and provide rare insight into the inner workings of the nation's homeland security apparatus.

Ridge said he wanted to "debunk the myth" that his agency was responsible for repeatedly raising the alert under a color-coded system he unveiled in 2002.

"More often than not we were the least inclined to raise it," Ridge told reporters. "Sometimes we disagreed with the intelligence assessment. Sometimes we thought even if the intelligence was good, you don't necessarily put the country on (alert). ... There were times when some people were really aggressive about raising it, and we said, 'For that?' "

Revising or scrapping the color-coded alert system is under review by new Homeland Security secretary Michael Chertoff. Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said "improvements and adjustments" may be announced within the next few months.

The threat level was last raised on a nationwide scale in December 2003, to orange from yellow - or "elevated" risk - where the alert level is now. In most cases, Ridge said Homeland Security officials didn't want to raise the level because they knew local governments and businesses would have to spend money putting temporary security upgrades in place.

"You have to use that tool of communication very sparingly," Ridge said at the forum, which was attended by seven other former department leaders.

The level is raised if a majority on the President's Homeland Security Advisory Council favors it and President Bush concurs. Among those on the council with Ridge were Attorney General John Ashcroft, FBI chief Robert Mueller, CIA director George Tenet, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell.

Ridge and Ashcroft publicly clashed over how to communicate threat information to the public. But Ridge has never before discussed internal dissention over the threat level.

The color-coded system was controversial from the start. Polls showed the public found it confusing.

Saturday, May 7, 2005

It happened

As Cindy was typing her words in my last post...it happened.  How many more mom's will be added to the ones that will have a sad mothers day? 

 

Iraq blast kills Miss. native

Sgt. John McGee, raised in Delta, one of 23 killed in explosion

By Lora Hines / The Clarion-Ledger

Rebecca McGee of Cary got a Mother's Day card on Monday from her son, Sgt. John McGee, who was stationed with his Alabama National Guard unit in Iraq.

The next day, the 72-year-old mother was getting ready for work when an Army chaplain arrived at her front door.

"I knew why he was there," McGee said. "I was stunned for words."

Sgt. John McGee, 36, was one of 23 soldiers who died in an explosion earlier this week while riding in a vehicle, said his mother. She did not know the cause of the blast.

"I really didn't cry," McGee said. "I said, 'Lord, have mercy' as I was walking around."

Officials from the Alabama National Guard could not be reached Wednesday for comment.

Lt. Col. Tim Powell of the Mississippi National Guard said he didn't know details about McGee's death.

Since military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq began, 27 soldiers with ties to Mississippi have died.

About a week ago, McGee briefly visited with her son as he stopped by before returning to Iraq. He had been on leave, said his sister, Sharon McGee-Barnes. "He was trying to make the rounds," she said.

Her brother had spent much of his leave waiting for a car he bought on eBay to be delivered to his home in Columbus, Ga., McGee-Barnes said. He decided to visit family in Mississippi after the car failed to arrive. "The car came the day after he left for Iraq," McGee-Barnes said.

Rebecca McGee recalled how she helped her son enlist in the Army when he was 17 and a 1986 graduate of South Delta High School. He joined the Alabama National Guard in the late 1990s, McGee-Barnes said.

He was expected to leave the National Guard in August, spend some time with family and then enroll in school, his mother said.

She said her son was devout in his faith, and she knows she will see him again. "I'm going to reunite with my son," Rebecca McGee said. "All God's children go to heaven. When I walk inside, I'll look for him. I'll recognize his smile."

Mothers Day - Broken Hearts That Will Not Heal

 Name Withheld Pending Notification

When I woke up this morning, the “official” death count in Iraq was 1576. The first thing I do in the morning after I boot up my computer is to check the DoD website to see if any more of our nation’s precious children were killed in this horror of a nonsensical war. I was talking to another Gold Star Mom, Celeste Zappala, today and she sadly advised me that the count rose to 1579 (note: the official count is now 1594) while she was out to lunch.

Celeste and I and too many other moms know what the significance of “Pending Notification” means: it means that there are people in our country going through their lives right now not even knowing that they are about to be ambushed with the most devastating news of their lives: “We regret to inform you….”

 

Somewhere in America there is a mom (I always think of the moms first) shopping for groceries, driving home from a long week of work, or maybe even planning her soldier’s homecoming party. Somewhere, here in our country there is a mother who is hoping that she will receive a Mother’s Day card from her soldier, or perhaps, if she is extremely lucky, a rushed telephone call. There is a mom out there who has been worried sick about her soldier since they arrived in the combat zone. Maybe the mom still supports George Bush and the occupation or maybe the mom is certain if her child is killed in this abomination that her sweet baby, her soldier will have died for lies and betrayals. In the end, and at that moment, the mom is not going to care about politics or about reasons for invasion and occupation. She won’t care if her child died for freedom and democracy, or to make some people wealthier and more powerful. All she will see is the Grim Reaper in a uniform standing at her door before she collapses on the floor screaming for her child and pleading with the Grim Reaper to take her with him

 

Somewhere there is a father in America who won’t know what hit him and who won't know whom to hit back. There are brothers and sisters, nieces and nephews, spouses, and children who are about to step on the path of unbearable pain and seemingly endless grief. Today there are the families and friends of three wonderful human beings who never, until now, knew that the human body could produce so many tears. Somewhere in America live our fellow citizens who never even knew that a broken heart is not theoretical or symbolic. These most unfortunates are about to find out that a broken heart hurts far worse than a broken limb, and does not heal so readily, if ever at all.

 

The families of these soldiers are also departing on a long tour of banalities uttered by well-meaning, but let’s face it, uninformed people.  I hear these phrases over and over again: “Time heals every thing”, “Casey’s in a better place”, (oh really, I didn’t know that home with his mom was such a bad place to be), “Casey wants you to be happy”, “Casey died doing what he loved doing”, (he did?), or, my favorite, “Casey died defending his country”.  Let me assure the reader, phrases like this do not help. They are clichés for one thing, and for another, none of them are true. None of them help a grieving family. If you, the reader, is ever in the situation facing a mom who had her son brutally murdered, God forbid, I will give you hints on what does help: hugs (lots and lots), make sure she eats, make sure she drinks plenty of water (tears are dehydrating), make sure she hears wonderful things about her child, bring boxes of tissues and toilet paper, and bring yourself. Leave your tired and impotent clichés at the door.

 

Of course, the most tragic thing about the 1579 is that not even one should be dead. Our “president” cheerfully rushed this country into a needlessly horrendous and devastating invasion. Our “president” thinks stolen elections confer a mandate. Our Congress cheerfully relinquished their Constitutional responsibility to declare war. If they had any courage or honor they would claim that right back and end this travesty. I have a feeling our mis-leaders will be having a nice day with their moms or their children on Mother's Day. As they are eating their brunches and giving and receiving bouquets of Mother's Day flowers, they probably never even think about the moms in this world that their insanely reckless policies have destroyed. It never enters their wicked brains that they have ruined Mother's Day for so many families. This is a tragedy.

 

Our media was, and still is, a willing shill for the Administration and has never told the American public the truth. Reporting about Iraq is always trumped by such as child molesters, Martha Stewart, Terri Schiavo, Scott Peterson, the American Idol, or now, Runaway Brides! Another tragic thing about this illegal and disastrous invasion and occupation is that there are only 1579 families in this country who even have to think about Iraq. Most Americans probably don’t even know where to find Iraq on a map. The Halliburtons, Bechtels, KBRs, and the oil oligarchs of the world, who are laughing all the way to the bank, think of Iraq with greedy glee each day. Sorrowfully, there are 1579 families in thiscountry who have “Iraq carved on their hearts and souls for eternity. We have sacrificed more than the $1.99 it costs to buy a “Support the Troops” magnet for our cars. We have had a violent amputation. Even if our fellow citizens don’t realize it, by allowing this occupation to continue, they are also losing a very important part of themselves: their humanity.

 

My heart, my prayers, and my love go to the three families who are now embarking on this mournful, unnecessary journey. We at Gold Star Families for Peace are here for them. I hope they find comfort in what I know now seems like a comfortless world. Peace.

 

Love and Peace!!!
Cindy Sheehan

Mother of Hero: Spc Casey Austin Sheehan KIA 04/04/04
Casey's Peace Page
Cofounder
of Gold Star Families For Peace
www.GSFP.org

Friday, May 6, 2005

Impeachment starts with them. WRITE LETTERS, MAKE CALLS

http://www.rawstory.com/aexternal/conyers_iraq_letter_502

SECRET PLANS
Eighty-eight members of Congress call on Bush for answers on secret Iraq plan

RAW STORY

Eighty-eight members of Congress have signed a letter authored by Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) calling on President Bush to answer questions about a secret U.S.-UK agreement to attack Iraq, RAW STORY has learned.

In a letter, Conyers and other members say they are disappointed the mainstream media has not touched the revelations.

"Unfortunately, the mainstream media in the United States was too busy with wall-to-wall coverage of a "runaway bride" to cover a bombshell report out of the British newspapers," Conyers writes. "The London Times reports that the British government and the United States government had secretly agreed to attack Iraq in 2002, before authorization was sought for such an attack in Congress, and had discussed creating pretextual justifications for doing so."

"The Times reports, based on a newly discovered document, that in 2002 British Prime Minister Tony Blair chaired a meeting in which he expressed his support for "regime change" through the use of force in Iraq and was warned by the nation's top lawyer that such an action would be illegal," he adds. "Blair also discussed the need for America to "create" conditions to justify the war."

The members say they are seeking an inquiry.

"This should not be allowed to fall down the memory hole during wall-to-wall coverage of the Michael Jackson trial and a runaway bride," he remarks. "To prevent that from occuring, I am circulating the following letter among my House colleagues and asking them to sign on to it."

The letter follows.

###

May 5, 2005

The Honorable George W. Bush President of the United States of America The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20500

DearMr. President:

We write because of troubling revelations in the Sunday London Times apparently confirming that the United States and Great Britain had secretly agreed to attack Iraq in the summer of 2002, well before the invasion and before you even sought Congressional authority to engage in military action. While various individuals have asserted this to be the case before, including Paul O'Neill, former U.S. Treasury Secretary, and Richard Clarke, a former National Security Council official, they have been previously dismissed by your Administration. However, when this story was divulged last weekend, Prime Minister Blair's representative claimed the document contained "nothing new." If the disclosure is accurate, it raises troubling new questions regarding the legal justifications for the war as well as the integrity of your own Administration.

The Sunday Times obtained a leaked document with the minutes of a secret meeting from highly placed sources inside the British Government. Among other things, the document revealed:

* Prime Minister Tony Blair chaired a July 2002 meeting, at which he discussed military options, having already committed himself to supporting President Bush's plans for invading Iraq.

* British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw acknowledged that the case for war was "thin" as "Saddam was not threatening his neighbours and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea, or Iran."

* A separate secret briefing for the meeting said that Britain and America had to "create" conditions to justify a war.

* A British official "reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

As a result of this recent disclosure, wewould like to know the following:

1) Do you or anyone in your Administration dispute the accuracy of the leaked document?

2) Were arrangements being made, including the recruitment of allies, before you sought Congressional authorization go to war? Did you or anyone in your Administration obtain Britain's commitment to invade prior to this time?

3) Was there an effort to create an ultimatum about weapons inspectors in order to help with the justification for the war as the minutes indicate?

4) At what point in time did you and Prime Minister Blair first agree it was necessary to invade Iraq?

5) Was there a coordinated effort with the U.S. intelligence community and/or British officials to "fix" the intelligence and facts around the policy as the leaked document states?

We have of course known for some time that subsequent to the invasion there have been a variety of varying reasons proffered to justify the invasion, particularly since the time it became evident that weapons of mass destruction would not be found. This leaked document - essentially acknowledged by the Blair government - is the first confirmation that the rationales were shifting well before the invasion as well.

Given the importance of this matter, we would ask that you respond to this inquiry as promptly as possible. Thank you.

Sincerely,

Members who have already signed letter:
Neil Abercrombie
Brian Baird
Tammy Baldwin
Xavier Becerra
Shelley Berkley
Eddie Bernice Johnson
Sanford Bishop
Earl Blumenauer
Corrine Brown
Sherrod Brown
G.K. Butterfield
Emanuel Cleaver
James Clyburn
John Conyers
Jim Cooper
Elijah Cummings
Danny Davis
Peter DeFazio
Diana DeGette
Bill Delahunt
Rosa DeLauro
Lloyd Doggett
Sam Farr
Bob Filner
Harold Ford, Jr.
Barney Frank
Al Green
Raul Grijalva
Louis Gutierrez
Alcee Hastings
Maurice Hinchey
Rush Holt
Jay Inslee
Sheila Jackson Lee
Jessie Jackson Jr.
Marcy Kaptur
Patrick Kennedy
Dale Kildee
Carolyn Kilpatrick
Dennis Kucinich
William Lacy Clay
Barbara Lee
John Lewis
Zoe Lofgren
Donna M. Christensen
Carolyn Maloney
Ed Markey
Carolyn McCarthy
Jim McDermott
James McGovern
Cynthia McKinney
Martin Meehan
Kendrick Meek
Gregory Meeks
Michael Michaud
George Miller
Gwen S. Moore
James Moran
Jerrold Nadler
Grace Napolitano
James Oberstar
John Olver
Major Owens
Frank Pallone
Donald Payne
Charles Rangel
Bobby Rush
Bernie Sanders
Linda Sanchez
Jan Schakowsky
Jose Serrano
Ike Skelton
Louise Slaughter
Hilda Solis
Pete Stark
Ellen Tauscher
Bennie Thompson
Edolphus Towns
Stephanie Tubbs Jones
Chris Van Hollen
Nydia Velazquez
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Maxine Waters
Diane Watson
Melvin Watt
Robert Wexler
Lynn Woolsey
David Wu
Albert R. Wynn

Thursday, May 5, 2005

Please Send A Letter

  Dear Friends,  

This is where we start. I believe it is up to all of us to help Cindy and families like her's.   

We need masses of people to let them know we are not happy with all the murder in our name as Americans.  

Please write a letter to Conyers and help Cindy Sheehan. Please forward her letter and have others do the same.  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forwarded Message:
 

 Below is a letter I sent to Congressman John Conyers to request that he introduce Articles of Impeachment for Bush, Cheney and the entire gang. You, too, can send Mr Conyers a letter at: John.Conyers@mail.house.gov.  

 To the Honorable John Conyers, Jr.,  

Dear Congressman Conyers:  

First of all, thank you so much for your tireless efforts for the truth and for representing so admirably not only your constituents, but the people of America as well.   My son, Spc. Casey Austin Sheehan, was KIA in Iraq on 04 April, 2004. I knew when I was watching him leave me for that mistake of an invasion/occupation that it was an immoral war based on lies and exaggerations and that I should have somehow stopped him. But he went, and he was killed trying to rescue some of his buddies after he had only been in Iraq for two weeks.  

Congressman Conyers, this aggression in Iraq has been wrong from the beginning and has been proven over and over again to be a huge betrayal of the world. The memo about the upcoming invasion of Iraq that just recently surfaced in Great Britain, dated 23 July 2002, is only confirmation of what we already know: the intelligence was cooked and manipulated to fit the goals of the Administration driven by the Neo-Con agenda. Part of the memo states:      

  C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible shift in         attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove             Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and         WMD.  

Congressman Conyers, in July of 2002, my son didn't even realize that he was already a dead man. My entire family was still living our lives like we were always going to have each other. We were operating under the false and tragic assumption that all the children would bury the parents. Casey had a good life and we were a happy family. Casey was a kind, generous, intelligent, loving, funny, and indispensable part of our lives. Our lives have now been ripped open and devastated by his needless murder.   There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The Duelfer report so clearly states that Iraq wouldn't even have had WMD's in the near future. Saddam did not plan and execute 9/11. We all know who did plan 9/11 and that person is still running free. The policies of the murderous thugs in the White House have killed thousands of innocent people in Afghanistan who had no connection with 9/11. The same pack of liars and murderers in the Bush regime is responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent Iraqis and many hundreds of innocent Americans. How many people are George Bush, et al, going to slaughter before they feel some kind of revenge (no matter how misplaced) for 9/11? The leaders of our country rushed us recklessly headlong into an invasion that should never have happened and our children are still not properly armed, armored, equipped, or trained. In my opinion, the invasion could have waited forever, or at least until Rumsfeld had the Army that he "wanted."  

Congressman, the only people the aggression in Iraq have benefited are the people who have become fabulously wealthy because of it. Follow the money trail and you will see who is responsible for so much senseless bloodshed. In addition, there are billions of dollars missing from the Provisional Authority in Iraq. BILLIONS! Who will be held accountable for that crime? The criminals that need to be held accountable are master manipulators and they need to be brought to justice.  

In addition to the treasonous lies that convinced some of our fellow citizens that we needed to invade a sovereign country that posed no threat to the USA, our country has stooped to the most lowest of forms of humanity: humiliating and painful torture of our so-called enemies. The orders for this torture were given and endorsed from the very top of the chain of command and the only people who are beingpunished are privates and specialists from West Virginia. The people who should be held accountable for the despicable crimes of torture sit in comfy offices on nice chairs counting their money in the Oval Office, VPs office, Pentagon, and the Attorney General's office. Every one of the people who defile these offices should be arrested and handcuffed for war crimes and treason.  

Congressman Conyers, it is obvious to me that George Bush has committed high crimes and misdemeanors against this country and the citizens of the world. His lies, betrayals, mistakes, miscalculations, arrogance and stupidity are responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people and the destruction of a sovereign nation and civilization.    I am strongly urging you to introduce Articles of Impeachment for Bush and Cheney. It is the only moral thing to do to try and stop these immoral people who are waging an immoral war. The resignations of Rumsfeld, Rice and Gonzales should also be stridently called for. There should actually be a wholesale cleaning out of the Pentagon and the Cabinet to get this country and the world back on track to healing and regaining our humanity.  

Congressman, nothing will bring my son back. However, seeing the monsters who sent him to be killed in a prefabricated war, brought to justice, will help my healing process immensely. Also, seeing the occupation end and the bloodshed stop will be the best outcome of getting the thugs out of our government.  

In Peace and Hope, and with all sincerity,

Cindy Sheehan

Cofounder of Gold Star Families for Peace  http://www.gsfp.org/    

Impeachment Time!!!

IMPEACHMENT TIME: "FACTS WERE FIXED."
Special to BuzzFlash
Thursday, May 5, 2005
By Greg Palast

Here it is. The smoking gun. The memo that has "IMPEACH HIM" written all over it.

The top-level government memo marked "SECRET AND STRICTLY PERSONAL," dated eight months before Bush sent us into Iraq, following a closed meeting with the President, reads, "Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy."

Read that again: "The intelligence and facts were being fixed...."

For years, after each damning report on BBC TV, viewers inevitably ask me, "Isn't this grounds for impeachment?" -- vote rigging, a blind eye to terror and the bin Ladens before 9-11, and so on. Evil, stupidity and self-dealing are shameful but not impeachable. What's needed is a "high crime or misdemeanor."

And if this ain't it, nothing is.

The memo, uncovered this week by the Times, goes on to describe an elaborate plan by George Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair to hoodwink the planet into supporting an attack on Iraq knowing full well the evidence for war was a phony.

A conspiracy to commit serial fraud is, under federal law, racketeering. However, the Mob's schemes never cost so many lives.

Here's more. "Bush had made up his mind to take military action. But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran."

Really? But Mr. Bush told us, "Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised."

A month ago, the Silberman-Robb Commission issued its report on WMD intelligence before the war, dismissing claims that Bush fixed the facts with this snooty, condescending conclusion written directly to the President, "After a thorough review, the Commission found no indication that the Intelligence Community distorted the evidence regarding Iraq's weapons."

We now know the report was a bogus 618 pages of thick whitewash aimed to let Bush off the hook for his murderous mendacity.

Read on: The invasion build-up was then set, says the memo, "beginning 30 days before the US Congressional elections." Mission accomplished.

You should parse the entire memo -- posted on my website -- and see if you can make it through its three pages without losing your lunch.

Now sharp readers may note they didn't see this memo, in fact, printed in the New York Times. It wasn't. Rather, it was splashed across the front pages of the Times of LONDON on Monday.

It has effectively finished the last, sorry remnants of Tony Blair's political career. (While his Labor Party will most assuredly win the elections Thursday, Prime Minister Blair is expected, possibly within months, to be shoved overboard in favor of his Chancellor of the Exchequer, a political execution which requires only a vote of the Labour party's members in Parliament.)

But in the US, barely a word. The New York Times covers this hard evidence of Bush's fabrication of a casus belli as some "British" elections story. Apparently, our President's fraud isn't "news fit to print."

My colleagues in the UK press have skewered Blair, digging out more incriminating memos, challenging the official government factoids and fibs. But in the US press
nada, bubkes, zilch. Bush fixed the facts and somehow that's a story for "over there."

The Republicans impeached Bill Clinton over his cigar and Monica's affections. And the US media could print nothing else.

Now, we have the stone, cold evidence of bending intelligence to sell us on death by the thousands, and neither a Republican Congress nor what is laughably called US journalism thought it worth a second look.

My friend Daniel Ellsberg once said that what's good about the American people is that you have to lie to them. What's bad about Americans is that it's so easy to do.


-----------
Greg Palast is author of the New York Times bestseller, The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.  Read the memo in its entirety at www.GregPalast.com

You may reproduce this report without fee but with attribution.

Media requests: contact(at)gregpalast.com



============================================
If you would like to have your e-mail address removed from this mailing list. Cut and paste the following URL into your browser address bar. This will automatically remove from the mailing list and you will receive no further mailings.
http://www.gregpalast.com/emailremove.cfm?id=59457